Talk:Laid Back (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reference Problem[edit]

I could not find any references maybe you can if you do just remove my reference notice --Mactrac (talk) 01:31, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The references are in the reviews listed in the infobox. Wasted Time R (talk) 02:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok i see them now, sorry about that Mactrac (talk) 18:28, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Laid Back (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Retrohead (talk · contribs) 15:06, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The review
  • There's a "citation needed" tag about the recording date (in the lead and infobox).
  • The 'Composition' section seems not fully researched. Do we have information about the other tracks?
  • There's a minor miss in the certifications. Per RIAA, gold equals half a million copies shipped.
  • Apart from the notes above, the rest of the article seems fine. I'll put this on hold.
Hey thanks for the review. I've added a reference for its release date. I'd hoped for the composition section to be fulfilled over time (as a poorly-remembered album, there isn't THAT much info on its tracks, nor will there likely be), so I've reincorporated it into the recording section. The RIAA thing was my bad; I'd thought that gold, prior to 1975 or so, represented 1 million sales but I was mistaken. Alright, let me know if there's any more to be done. Thanks again. Saginaw-hitchhiker (talk) 05:12, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Lead info not expanded upon[edit]

This information from the lead, "The album explores Allman's varying influences, including rhythm and blues and soul music. It consists of several cover songs, originals, and a traditional hymn", I was sad to not see mentioned again in the main body of the article. Not knowing what the source for this information is, shouldn't it really be expanded upon in the body to justify it being in the lead?--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 11:07, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]