Talk:Kyla Cole

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Slovakia Low‑importance

	Slovakia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pornography Mid‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Untitled[edit]

Is there a source for Cole's real name? Both the English and Slovak Wikipedias have it, but there is a statement on her website for helping orphans which suggests she believes it to be secret [1]:

Who is Adrian Daskalov and why do we send money to that name?

Well, obviously Kyla Cole is not my real name. I do not feel very safe to reveal my real name to the wide Internet public because I’ve already had an unpleasant experience with some weirdo who not only threatened me but also my closest family.

--Saforrest 17:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DreamingWith link[edit]

It's boring defending my website all the time like that with many users thinking spam or other bad things and play only with delete !! Your deleting represente your incapacity to administrate a page !! You never give explanation !! You say spam but It's not spam ! If DreamingWith present in external links, because IS the place for this sort of links ! It's not lame links or others things, I purpose news, a new informations about models you can't find in other website !! By this way I have a place on external link and I follow excactly the rules of external link !! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.231.87.202 (talk • contribs) 12:16, 26 September 2006

And why should DreamingWith be posted? I look at it and I look at the Wikipedia:External links policy and it kinda falls short by my reckoning. Your inclusion of the site clearly violates clause 3 under the "Links normally to be avoided" section ("A website that you own or maintain, even if the guidelines above imply that it should be linked to"), and I hardly see how it can meet clause #1 of said section ("Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article here would have once it becomes a Wikipedia:Featured article"). The onus is on you to show why DreamingWith is a superior link which should remain in the Kyla Cole entry. Until then, I'll be removing it as linkspam. Tabercil 22:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When you speak about rules, I love that ! If you write any rules write completly not take part for speak about your truth !! You not alone in the wikipedia and by your action you make sort of "vandalism" if you decide only by yourself if something is good or bad ! And more when you repeat delete whithout any good explanation !!

So, I note when you write "A website that you own or maintain, even if the guidelines above imply that it should be linked to", but since 2 weeks I explain why I post my link "It's a mention" and after we can discuss about integration about link like the sames rules you write but not complete: "If it is relevant and informative, mention it on the talk page and let other — neutral — Wikipedia editors decide whether to add the link."

I don't know why you take this rule "Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article here would have once it becomes a Wikipedia:Featured article" !! Cause the first time when you open link you see information can't see in other websites link !!

My website promote Kyla Cole website in other form and I give news about where appear Kyla, unfortunatly Kyla don't give us many movies and I confess It's not easy give a fresh news about this pornstar the Kyla Cole website is so complete for that, so appear on magazine and I inform when she appear in magazine, It's an original information you can't find in other your links same on Kyla Cole website (you can find only back issues), by this way my link appear good for External Link !!! Why not I can think free, perhaps you work for IMDB or IAFD and you don't want find any concurrent to you on this article !! You don't have neutral attitude and you think only by yourself !! I am not sure that you know what want to say the word "community" ! 82.231.87.202 13:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see your deleted action in other article !! By this way, you make really "vandalism" !! You not here for manking your law !! You not alone and the true not inside only your hands !! 82.231.87.202 13:37, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sir (or ma'am), I feel it is safe to say that English is not your native language, and as a consequence what you wrote makes for rather rough reading... though in fairness it is probably more legible than whatever missive I were to attempt in your native language. As a result, I have a great degree of difficulty in following what you are trying to say, and I will try to answer what I believe what your points are, and I apologize in advance for any misunderstandings...

You mention "2 weeks", which I assume to mean that you felt that having the link remain in the article for the two weeks implied it was acceptable. In fairness, I did not notice it had been restored to the article until the addition User:Pkpao made to the external links. If I had noticed it, I would have removed it much sooner.

You also make mention of someone writing this:

"If it is relevant and informative, mention it on the talk page and let other — neutral — Wikipedia editors decide whether to add the link."

I do not believe I wrote that (though given how many articles I've edited I might be mistaken), and I suspect it was written by a different Wikipedia editor, who I feel made a very sensible idea: remove the link from the main article, leave mention of DreamingWith on the talk page and let the other users decide if the link should or should not be on the page. Tabercil 02:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This link appear since the debut of year, and now because MR.Tabercil decide by himself to remove this link, I must take time for trying explain the reason of presence !! Before you, I don't see any problem for others users ! DW never remove same if something other remove !! Plus, to speak about your actions, you decided by yourself to remove the other links in other articles without same consulting which that is!! And not knowing if I have a connection or not with the other websites !! By this way, we must speak about remove link (and link must stay) and not speak about add link (link not stay) !! —Preceding unsigned comment added by ALLtheTrue (talk • contribs) 04:50, 11 October 2006

I don't think the links you're provided have a place in the articles as they're borderline in terms of what additional information they provide beyond the links already in the info box, but trying to follow your statements is giving me a genuine headache, so I'm not going to bother for now to remove them. That does not mean they are valid and are judged to be appropriate for the article!! It just means I don't at this point wish to contest them, and that doesn't preclude someone else from removing the link. Tabercil 22:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

imdb and iafd have more place for sure !! iafd you can see just only 3 movies from andrew blake prod, in imdb you can see same with 1 penthouse movie and talk about FHM stuff !!

If you see by yourself on DW filmography you can see more !! DW can't speak about fresh news from Kyla cause Kyla don't make many movies (not DW fault) !!

By Kyla Cole says the filmography of herself is 3 movies for Andrew (master) Blake and 2 for penthouse !! Kyla Cole never speak about FHM stuff !

Other way, DW inform where appear Kyla on magazines, DW can't give another news and show me link where you find this information ? Same in official Kyla Cole website you can't find (just about back issues mag) !! And DW speak about other website where can find Kyla too !

Sorry If I give you headache, but in my side is not really attractive to speak with someone play with delete and do not seek further that the end from its nose !!ALLtheTrue 23:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Martina Jacová[edit]

Her name really IS Martina, I´m from Slovakia and everybody knows her name here. She even has a profile on facebook: #REDIRECT [[2]] --91.127.195.60 (talk) 13:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook isn't a reliable source. Dismas|^(talk) 14:03, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

added a site reference to solve the problem with her real name. hope it s ok, because this WP thing sometimes drives my crazy--78.99.130.18 (talk) 16:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kyla Cole. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for //bigbrother.no/2001/news/archive_front_news_988399200000.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:33, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kyla Cole. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:56, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]