Talk:King Records (Japan)

Japan: Business and economy / Music / Tokyo Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 19:18, April 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Business and economy task force.

This article is supported by the Music task force.

This article is supported by the Tokyo task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Record Labels

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

On suggesting the split...[edit]

It seems a little awkward that an active Japanese record company is grouped into the "defunct record labels" category just because on the unrelated U.S. King Records is truly defunct. IMHO,keeping this a single article would make expanding the "section" on the existing Japanese King Records somewhat difficult. Any thoughts? Ranma9617 01:35, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, some of the categories are only relevent to one of the "King" labels. Making this a disambiguation page is okay by me. Shall the split off pages be called "King Records (Japan)" and "King Records (USA)", or are their other suggestions? -- Infrogmation 01:56, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like the suggested split: King Records (Japan) and King Records (USA). It makes sense to not keep the Japanese label in the defunct record labels category. --日本穣 07:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On further consideration, it makes sense to give the current page to the active Japanese label, and put a disambiguation sentence at the top pointing to the defunct US label. --日本穣 07:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another logical idea within this one is merging the section on the defunct U.S. label into the existing Star-day King Records article...Ranma9617 01:48, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. No, I think that's not a good option since for an historically important part of its history US King had no "Star-day" connection. -- Infrogmation 02:35, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I split off the US label to King Records (USA). --日本穣 Nihonjoe 22:09, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone through all the pages linking here and fixed all the appropriate links to point at King Records (USA), so the split should be complete now. --日本穣 Nihonjoe 23:31, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]