Talk:King & Queen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleKing & Queen has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 31, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
December 21, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 24, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Otis Redding and Carla Thomas album King & Queen was Redding's first duet album, and the last studio album he recorded before his death?
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:King & Queen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 19:06, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

  • King & Queen, released in 1967 by Stax Records, is a duets album by Otis Redding and Carla Thomas, two of the label's most successful artists. --> Odd wording. How about something like: King & Queen is a studio album by American recording artists Otis Redding and Carla Thomas. It was released on March 16, 1967 by Stax Records.
  • Done
  • The LP was Redding's sixth album, and Thomas's fourth, and the final studio album released by Redding before his death. --> The album is Redding's sixth album and Thomas's fourth, and the final studio album released by Redding before his death on December 10, 1967.
Done
  • Marvin Gaye --> link
Done
  • Following Redding's death in December 1967, the single "Lovey Dovey" was also released. --> Released as what?
  • What do you mean?
  • The original LP's --> album's
  • Not sure why this needs a change, but done
  • Don't see a reason the lead should have two paragraphs; they could all fit in one.
  • I also don't see a reason why it should be one paragraph. Two paragraphs are better for clarity.--GoPTCN 10:20, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Background and recording[edit]

  • Who exactly is Jim Stewart?
  • Added he was the producer

Release[edit]

  • Six out of eleven songs were cut during their session; the rest were overdubbed by Redding in the following days owing to their concert obligations. --> Unsourced, and what does this have to do with the album's release?
  • Moved to recording section; it is actually sourced
  • Seems more appropriately entitled "release and promotion", as there's info about singles here.
  • How is this promotion?

Reception[edit]

  • King & Queen was given a positive critical reception by reviewers. --> King & Queen received generally positive acclaim from music critics.
  • Ok, done. But I am not sure about "positive acclaim"? Acclaim is always positive
  • Jason Ankeny from Allmusic --> Jason Ankeny of Allmusic
  • Done

Personnel[edit]

  • Source shouldn't be an external link.
  • This is better as placing the same ref all the time
  • I'm not understanding what you mean. Statυs (talk) 03:26, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Charts[edit]

  • Unsourced.
  • Added
  • Billboard --> US Billboard
  • Disagree. It is known that Billboard is the US chart, and it charted only there
  • R&B chart --> Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs
  • The current is better because of consistency
  • Pop chart --> Billboard Hot 100
  • Ditto
  • Pop chart (in albums) --> US Billboard 200
  • Ditto.
  • R&B chart (in albums) --> US Billboard Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums
  • Ditto
  • They are different charts, and should be done correctly. There is no such thing as the "Pop chart" and "Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs" and "Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums" are to different things. Statυs (talk) 03:26, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Question: As this album was released in 1967, there was no "hip-hop" chart then nor was there a Billboard 200. If you're going to use the actual name of the charts, shouldn't it be the name of the charts as they were named then? --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:29, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

  • 2 uncatgorized redirects
  • Allmusic is not a magazine, and should not be in italics. Publisher is also missing; Rovi Corporation
  • I deitalicized Allmusic. The publisher is actually not missing
  • Ref 3 --> work is BBC Music, publisher is BBC
  • Ok, done.

  • I'm sorry, but since you have failed to fix the remaining issues that are on the article, I cannot pass this article. I have left you a few notifications on your talk page asking the issues to be fixed, and they haven't been. The last one I stated that I would have to fail the article if they weren't fixed. Statυs (talk) 21:52, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:King & Queen/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: James086 (talk · contribs) 22:42, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • The second sentence in the lead section is hard to read. So as to group the artists together, instead of saying Redding→Thomas→Redding, perhaps it should read: "It is Thomas's fourth album and Thomas's sixth and the final studio album released before his death on December 10, 1967."
  • Ref 3 (BBC review) doesn't say anything about Redding co-writing "Ooh Carla, Ooh Otis". Also, who else wrote it?
  • In the release section, I think it should say "eight on the R&B chart and number thirty on the Pop charts Hot 100". Bold to indicated added text.
  • Pop chart is sometimes used as a synonym for Hot 100, but netherless replaced--Tomcat (7) 11:43, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Charts section under Album it says "Pop chart" but shouldn't it be "Top LPs" as per the chart's name at the time? The same applies to the "R&B chart" should be "Hot R&B LPs" or even "Top Black Albums", also the link should probably point to Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums.
  • For the Singles "R&B chart" should be "Hot Rhythm & Blues Singles" and "Pop chart" should be "Billboard Hot 100".
  • Could the release and the reception sections be combined into one "Release and reception"?
  • "King & Queen received generally positive acclaim..." - You can't receive negative acclaim, perhaps "King & Queen was generally positively received.."

I look forward to seeing these addressed. James086Talk 22:42, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One last thing I just noticed, the second last sentence of "Background and Recording" begins with the word "It", I assume this means the album? Just a little unclear if it refers to the album or just one song. Perhaps it could say it which tracks feature which artists. Good work, I've passed it as I think it meets the criteria anyway. James086Talk 20:46, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]