Talk:Kinchbus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kinchbus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Buses Low‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nottinghamshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nottinghamshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NottinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject NottinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject NottinghamshireNottinghamshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Derbyshire Low‑importance

	Derbyshire portal The article on Kinchbus is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

MORE INFO NEEDED ! Lukelouvon (talk) 22:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CSD[edit]

I found some refs in a Google News search. Give me a few minutes to add some of them. OlYeller^Talktome 02:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The article still needs work but notability has been established IMO. OlYeller^Talktome 02:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Leicester sunday services[edit]

Kinchbus have taken over the sunday operations of First Leicester's services 21 and 70 please see facebook.com/kinchbus (they posted a status about the services on 20th march) rather than just remove please check! Fatty2k10 (talk) 14:50, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did check the Facebook page but the timetables haven't been released yet which is why I haven't put them on yet. --MSalmon (talk) 14:57, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How to write out the routes[edit]

Routes between towns are straightforward to describe - just list the towns/villages it starts in, travels through and ends in. But how best to write those that are within Leicester or Loughborough? 21 was listed as "Leicester" to "St Matthew's" and, as such, read as a service that connects Leicester to a separate town or village called St Matthew's. But no - it's a service within Leicester, so it's nonsense to give simply "Leicester" as one of the endpoints of the route.

And 5, 11, 12 and Sprint are services within Loughborough. So "Loughborough" doesn't make sense as a via point in itself, though it's hard to list all the streets, or even all the areas of Loughborough, that it passes through. Still, there ought to be something better than claiming that they go via simply "Loughborough". — Smjg (talk) 23:40, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand what is so difficult to read about the table it givs the services listed and where they go to/from and the via points. --MSalmon (talk) 23:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't explain any more clearly. I still have not the slightest idea either what your difficulty is or why you think your edits are constructive. — Smjg (talk) 23:52, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kinchbus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019161947/http://kinchbus.co.uk/news_9kinchbus.aspx to http://kinchbus.co.uk/news_9kinchbus.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]