Talk:Kerberos (moon)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 12:04, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reading now! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 12:04, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

tidally locked – can this be linked or explained?
Its rotational period was about 5.33 days at the time of the New Horizons flyby, though this would later vary due to its chaotic rotation. –

suggest remove "would later", as it had varied before the flyby already.

All of Pluto's other moons including Kerberos – either remove "other" or "including".
The orbital period of 32.16756 – orbital period was just mentioned.
Kerberos received the minor planet designation S/2011 (134340) 1 because it was the first satellite (S) discovered orbiting minor planet (134340) in 2011 – I really would state that this minor planet (134340) is Pluto, for extra clarity.
Not that much of a problem for a GA, but I would avoid citing news sources whenever the scientific papers these news are based on can be cited directly.
Not sure about the "Science fiction" section. The first sentence might be relevant, but what does it mean for the topic, what it the relation to the moon? Did it influence the choice of name? The second paragraph misses a date, and a source. I suggest to either add a source or just remove.
All in all a nice and interesting little overview. Thanks for that. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 20:07, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you for your feedback. Nrco0e (talk) 00:17, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Promoting now. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]