Talk:Kepler-1229
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Making up spectral types[edit]
You're kidding, right? You know the temperature so you look up the spectral type in a table? Not only doesn't it work like that (not reliably anyway), but it is plainly original research. There is no source that says this star has a spectral type of M0V, therefore Wikipedia can't say that it does. Lithopsian (talk) 10:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Kepler-1229[edit]
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Kepler-1229's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "kepler-catalogue":
- From Kepler-61: "Kepler Input Catalog search result". Space Telescope Science Institute. Retrieved 25 July 2015.
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|deadurl=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - From Kepler-62f: "Kepler Input Catalog search result". Space Telescope Science Institute. Retrieved 18 April 2013.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)