Talk:Keilschrifttexte aus Assur religiösen Inhalts

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability concerns[edit]

None of the sources cited discuss this work in any depth or detail; rather, they analyze individual inscriptions that are included in this edition. To establish notability of a book, there should usually be at least two reviews of the book itself. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would these reviews + papers on it suffice?

* https://www.proquest.com/docview/1299180185?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals&imgSeq=1

* https://www.proquest.com/docview/1299165509?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals&imgSeq=1

* https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/zava.1916.30.2.184/html?lang=de

Aside from these, it is not as easy to find sources discussing this volume in a general manner, but KAR has probably been cited thousands of times as a major compendium of primary sources in Assyriological studies. Most volumes will have a one or two page list of abbreviations at the start and KAR will be listed among them. I have also added sources showing KAR is one of the main sources of tablets for reconstructing the Enuma Elish. Pogenplain (talk) 00:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those seem to be enough, although the first and second links are the same scholar. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have also added https://www.jstor.org/stable/23284290 Pogenplain (talk) 01:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]