Talk:Kartik Aaryan/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 05:49, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. Thank you. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 05:49, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"Both his parents are doctors; his father is a paediatrician, and his mother, Mala, is a gynaecologist." — Wikilink "paediatrician" and "gynaecologist" just in case the reader might not get the meaning of them. Did you manage to find Kartik's father's name by any chance?
"He has said that while filming for the project," — Said to whom? Do mention that he said it in an interview with the person who interviewed them.
"His next film release came two years later when he collaborated once again with Ranjan and Bharucha in the romance Akaash Vani (2013).[18] It is about the titular lovers who are separated when Vani is married off to an abusive husband" — Can be rephrased as "His next film release came two years later when he collaborated once again with Ranjan and Bharucha in the romance Akaash Vani (2013), which is about the titular lovers who are separated when Vani is married off to an abusive husband" and by the way do mention what the source for the line "It is about the titular lovers who are separated when Vani is married off to an abusive husband" is.
"It tells the story of Sonu (Aaryan) who plots to separate his best friend (Singh) from his fiancée (Bharucha)." — Doesn't he try to separate them due to his suspicion of Sweety? You could add that/elaborate on that to make it more clearer for the readers.
"He has also committed to play the lead role in a Hindi-language remake" — Just "remake" would do as he is working in Hindi films.
You could mention about his vegetarian lifestyle (Since you included a "Hottest vegetarian celebrity award") in the initial part of the "Life and career" section if you could find more references on it. Not forcing you to do it but would be good if you managed to find references on it, if not, leave it as it is.
Wikilink the publishers (like The Indian Express, Mid Day, NDTV, The Hindu, Firstpost to name a few) and authors (Like Sudhish Kamath, Anna M. M. Vetticad, Namrata Joshi to name a few) in the references used on first instance of usage.

That's about it from me, Krimuk2.0. Do resolve these about comments and the article will be passed. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 14:55, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All done, Ssven2. Thanks for taking up the review. :) I didn't find anything concrete on his vegetarianism other than him stating that he's a vegetarian, so I've left that as is. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 15:30, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
Pass or Fail:

Thank you for addressing my comments, Krimuk2.0. Congratulations, the article has passed. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 16:43, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]