Talk:K Ingleside

Trains: Streetcars Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

More information:
/
	This article lacks references.
	It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:K Ingleside.

Train morphing at K–T boundary[edit]

I would like to add the following text because I believe it will improve the article:

In other words, the line implements train-morphing at directionally dependent asymmetric K–T boundary points.

Thanks! --Inetpuppy (talk) 05:53, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a light rail line, not geological bedrock, so talking about the K-T boundary is nonsensical. Your sentence is also convoluted, and is a poor attempt to rephrase what is already clearly explained with confusing verbiage. Also, trains don't "morph," whatever that is supposed to mean. --Kurykh (talk) 07:03, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New disambiguation[edit]

See K-T Line. Thanks, cheers! --Inetpuppy (talk) 03:12, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is this system a "premetro"?[edit]

The premetro article contained a great deal of original research, and characterized a large number of light-rail or streetcar routes as "premetro" systems for questionable reasons -- like that the light-rail or streetcar system had a short tunneled section. More recently the premetro article has been scaled back, to only include systems that verifiable authoritative sources have called "premetro" systems.

Unfortunately dozens of questionable incoming links were made to the premetro article, from articles like this one, that didn't supply any references that verified systems like this one had ever been called premetro systems.

I am going to place a {{dubious}} tag next to all questionable claims that provide questionable incoming links to premetro.

If no authoritative references ever called this a "premetro" system that phrase should be removed from this article, link and all. Geo Swan (talk) 17:28, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on K Ingleside. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Light Blue Line (Muni Metro)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Light Blue Line (Muni Metro) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 6#Light Blue Line (Muni Metro) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 14:39, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Light Blue Line (San Francisco)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Light Blue Line (San Francisco) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 6#Light Blue Line (San Francisco) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 14:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]