Talk:KUSD (AM)

A fact from KUSD (AM) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 August 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that when the University of South Dakota started a radio station, the transmitter was built by student and future Nobel Prize winner Ernest Lawrence?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/KUSD (AM).

Wikipedia

Radio Stations Low‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Dakota Low‑importance

	South Dakota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:01, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that when the University of South Dakota started a radio station, the transmitter was built by future Nobel Prize winner and then-student Ernest Lawrence? Source: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/106124486/kusd-sees-big-stride-university-radio/
- ALT1: ... that the radio station at the University of South Dakota once presented a talk on "The Young Victor Hugo" between halves of a football game? Source: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/106124236/coyote-nodak-game-will-be-broadcast/
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Appraisal rights

Created by Thomas H. White (talk) and Sammi Brie (talk). Nominated by Sammi Brie (talk) at 06:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Earwig's Copyvio detector shows a match of 28.1%, but the site in question states "Text taken from Wikipedia". I prefer the original hook to ALT1, but both are OK. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:52, 25 July 2022 (UTC) Thomas H. White and Sammi Brie: Not sure if I'm just missing something obvious, but what in the body supports the lead's "At the time of its deletion, KUSD was the oldest broadcasting station in the state of South Dakota" and "it was the predecessor to the present radio service of South Dakota Public Broadcasting."? Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 12:09, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BennyOnTheLoose: Added a ref and a ref invoke in the lead to resolve this. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:30, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sammi Brie: MOS:INTRO says that "Apart from basic facts, significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article." Ideally, I think the cited info from the lead should be repeated, with the citations, in the body, and then the citations taken out of the lead. But happy to discuss if you disagree. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BennyOnTheLoose: Moved one out but kept the other which I feel is merited and would be awkward to shove in prose the way it's configured. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:51, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]