Talk:KQLV (FM)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: New Mexico Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Mexico portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Mexico (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Radio Stations

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Not a crystal ball[edit]

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Content in an article should not speculate about future possibilities, but stick to the current verifiable facts. Clear Channel is (as of 7/9/07) still not "private", and the FCC still lists Clear Channel as the license owner. What happened in 2006 was its intention to go private, which subsequently has been bogged down by disagreement by investors. I'm going to strip out any unsourced information that is speculation. If you have an independent reputable source, please add it. "I know it's true because I work at the station" is not an acceptable source.

Part of my concern about this speculation is that the FCC has a mandate that the area below 92 Mhz is reserved for educational/non-profit licensees and 92 Mhz and above is for commercial stations. While there are a few exceptions where non-commercial stations operate in the commercial band, I would be surprised if the FCC approves the frequency swap and removes a license from the commercial spectrum. The application to modify license from commercial to non-commercial filed with FCC and the appllication to assign the license to EMF have not yet been approved as of this date.StreamingRadioGuide 02:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It has been confirmed that KSFQ will switch to the K-Love network. In addition to KSFQ being outside of the top 100 markets, the smooth jazz format is redundant with KABQ-FM, which covers a larger area. When the smooth jazz format is dropped, the station will at first simulcast with KSFR. KSFQ will then move to 90.7 FM under the K-Love network, and KSFR will move to 101.FM. ANDROS¹³³⁷ 13:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What part of "will" was unclear? Wikipedia does not document possible future events.

Now that the transfer is complete, would you please unravel this article and clean it up? Thanks.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 09:32, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ksfr.gif[edit]

Image:Ksfr.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ksfr.gif[edit]

Image:Ksfr.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]