Talk:KCHR-FM

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arkansas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arkansas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas.

Notability?[edit]

My speedy deletion notice was removed for the reason "all radio stations are notable". Searching, I found an old page suggesting all Class B or C FM stations could be considered notable, but that page is marked inactive. Notability (media), a nonbinding essay, suggests "Notability can be established by either a large audience, established broadcast history, or unique programming." Also, "Editors might consider creating a table listing the radio stations in an area which might be redirected to rather than creating dozens of stub articles."

Is there a consensus on the relevant guidelines? Dmwiki (talk) 07:13, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The station is licensed by the FCC and currently transmitting programming, so it meets the minimum guidelines for notability. The station just launched, so obviously there won't be that much to find, so please consult with WT:WPRS if you have any concerns. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 07:16, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I wasn't aware that was the relevant rule. Thanks! Dmwiki (talk) 07:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A recent RFC on WP:Notability_(media) rejected automatic notability. Significant RS coverage is required. No refs in article (and indiscriminate catalog listing don't establish Notability), and breif google search found nothing. Tagged article as dubious Notability. Alsee (talk) 07:26, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]