Talk:KBUE

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Radio Stations

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Fair use rationale for Image:KBUE-FM.png[edit]

Image:KBUE-FM.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To 'merge KNAC into KBUE, given the overlap in content, particular if unreferenced comments on KNAC were removed. Klbrain (talk) 05:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We maintain only one article in most cases about a single FCC license. KNAC should be incorporated into KBUE. Raymie (t • c) 01:37, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support merger of KNAC into KBUE. Both articles are about the same station, and there are no exceptional circumstances here that would warrant separate articles.--Tdl1060 (talk) 23:11, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support merger per nom. --DrChuck68 (talk) 19:29, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support merger per nomination. Nathan Obral (talk) 04:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support: There's not much reason why KNAC should have a separate article from KBUE. That KNAC wound up with a webcast revival isn't enough — webcasts generally are held to a higher notability standard than FCC-licensed broadcast stations. (All that said, how much of the crappily-sourced-at-best material at KNAC should be carried over to the KBUE article?) --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:34, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wcquidditch and Raymie: maybe we need to do a ceremonial merger for this? Raymie and I did the same for KFAC, almost rewriting the KWKW article from scratch and taking the few good sources available from the KFAC article. The online incarnation of KNAC is pretty much a footnote, this isn't Q101 Chicago we're talking about. Nathan Obral (talk) 20:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

@Nathan Obral, Wcquidditch, and Raymie: it's probably better for one of you to do it, as the subject is outside my area of expertise.