Talk:Kızılırmak Delta/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Unsuccessful. grungaloo (talk) 22:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grungaloo (talk · contribs) 22:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chidgk1, I've taken a look at this and unfortunately I think this is a quick fail. I think it fails criteria 1A and 1B in particular, and needs a lot of work before making it to GA status. The main issues I see are:

Prose is very choppy. It's a lot of short, declarative sentences with no flow between them.
WP:REPEATCITE occurs quite a bit throughout.
WP:OVERSECTION, there's sections that only have a single line in them. Virtually all of "Ecosystems and habitat" could be condensed to a few paragraphs with no subsections.

I think the content is there and there's the potential to meet GA, but not without a significant rewrite. I'd recommend looking at Dilek Peninsula-Büyük Menderes Delta National Park for a good example of the type of prose you should be aiming for. If you need some help with the rewrites, you can put a request in at WP:GOCE.

I hope this doesn't discourage you from continuing to work on this - I can tell you've put a lot of effort. If you'd like, I can provide a more detailed list of things to improve on the article's talk page. grungaloo (talk) 22:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.