This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I'm a bit confused as to why this page keeps getting reverted to a previous state, with both unreferenced and incorrect information. Regarding the results of the District 39 House race, I am unable to find a source that is declaring a winner at the time of writing. Neither WPRI, nor WJAR have declared a winner and neither candidate has conceded. If a winner has been declared it should be appropriately sourced. Regardless, if Price does lose this seat, he is still a rep until the next term. I'm assuming this is a oversight, but feel like a more diligence should be done before clicking that revert button. @TheManInTheBlackHat:, @Equine-man:Skipple☎ 03:39, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If there is still any doubt, Price is filing for a recount. See source. Skipple☎ 04:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I’m a bit confused why you think it’s ok that major edits were done without doing an edit summary. Equine-man (talk) 07:53, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not suggesting that an inaccurate edit summary is 'ok' and obviously a detailed and accurate edit summary would be preferred, but the lack of accurate edit summary, especially one done by an inexperienced IP editor, is not reason alone to revert. Regardless, I wanted to simply clarify this as I was making the current changes in an effort to AVOID EDIT WAR. Skipple☎ 12:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Skipple, can you link where I reverted your edits? TheManInTheBlackHat (talk) 12:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In reference to this edit here, I reverted because there was no citation for a significant change to the page. Because of the unusual edit summary and no source cited, I assumed it was vandalism. TheManInTheBlackHat (talk) 13:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you're able to back that information up with a source, please do, I'll admit, I know little about this topic. TheManInTheBlackHat (talk) 13:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
