Talk:Just Dance Kids (2010 video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ABC[edit]

ABC by The Jackson 5 is barf! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.92.16 (talk) 23:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 03 December 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. -- Tavix (talk) 19:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Just Dance Kids (2010 video game)Just Dance Kids – Revert back to old title, which I can't do without help from an Adaim. Also part of my speedy deletion of the target page (which is an Disambiguation). Aaron's The Best (talk) 03:11, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Relisting. -- Tavix (talk) 20:29, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Steel1943 (talk) 03:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just Dance Kids is a disambiguation page, so this isn't a "revert back to old title. To move the nominated article to Just Dance Kids, a claim for it being the primary topic for the term "Just Dance Kids" will have to be established. Steel1943 (talk) 03:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Aaron's The Best: This request has been moved to full discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 03:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, target is a dab page and Amazon.com] has a lot of products in this series in different formats... seriously are these items notable? In ictu oculi (talk) 07:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, as that dab page is useless, and this should become the main topic. If you want to read about the naming mess, read this. Aaron's The Best (talk) 02:59, 18 December 2016 (UTC). This is an official reply.[reply]
You made the original request so you don't need to add a "support" !vote. --bonadea contributions talk 08:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose as there are no reasons why the 2010 game would be the main topic - it looks like a perfectly valid dab page for three articles about games with basically the same title. --bonadea contributions talk 08:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.