Talk:June Brigman

Edit May 17th

I removed the following paragraph:

Too busy to bother drawing three new panels every day, Ms. Brigman frequently recycles the art from an earlier strip. (For example, compare: [1] with [2]). Many comic fans and cartoonists consider this to be lazy and unprofessional.

One of the links is not working, but I did find the mentioned strips on another website. Although it's true that Brigman has recycled a panel from the previous day, this is common practice for many syndicated comic strips, especially for adventure/continuity strips where the readers have to be reminded of the plotline. Bust most importantly, I find that this paragraph reeks of POV with words like "Too busy to bother" and "Many comic fans and cartoonists consider this to be lazy and unprofessional." AEriksson 09:49, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

         **It may be a common practice but that doesn't change the fact that "Many comic fans and cartoonists consider this to be lazy and unprofessional."

• • "Many comic fans and cartoonists consider this"? Please do not speak for us. You show little sophistication in your knowledge of visual arts by doing so. I recommend your review Robert Rauschenberg or Warhol to see that repitition of an image has reason and is not the result of laziness.67.82.13.55 06:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

File:PowerPack1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:PowerPack1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 12 January 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:35, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on June Brigman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060302195804/http://www.comicspage.com/brendastarr/brendastarr.html to http://www.comicspage.com/brendastarr/brendastarr.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:18, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

"comic book artist"

The introduction describes her as an "American comic book artist", and while June certainly has been that, at this point she seems to have spent more of her career as a comic strip artist. As such, "American comics artist" may be more appropriate. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)