Talk:June 1976

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Months in the 1900s (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Months in the 1900s, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Months in the 1900sWikipedia:WikiProject Months in the 1900sTemplate:WikiProject Months in the 1900sMonths in the 1900s articles

On 23 September 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from June 1976 (month) to June 1976. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 23 September 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Most agreed that the month is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC based on long-term significance. A strong argument with respect to pageviews was given, but a clear majority seems to have felt long-term significance to be more important. (non-admin closure) VR _talk 13:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 1976 (month) → June 1976
June 1976 → June 1976 (disambiguation)

– As primary topic. Disambig is unneeded here. 91.124.117.75 (talk) 16:08, 23 September 2021 (UTC)— Relisted. 2pou (talk) 17:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:13, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@FMSky and 91.124.117.75: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ahecht:If anything, June 1976 (album) would be the primary topic, as it gets three times the page views. Defaulting to the disambig page is fine. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:34, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting associated moves explicitly. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 14:20, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per long-term significance and consistency. Chronological entities pretty consistently get top billing and it takes a lot to dethrone them. 1984 is the primary topic over Nineteen Eighty-Four despite the latter getting over 10x the pageviews. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support the month is the primary topic by long-term significance. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 02:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the arguments laid out by King of Hearts. ModernDayTrilobite (talk) 19:17, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Pageviews indicate most people landing on June 1976 are probably looking for the album. (Nineteen Eighty-Four is usually written out, so there's no title conflict in that case, unlike here.) Station1 (talk) 06:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, they don't. The only thing the pageviews indicate is that every person landing on June 1976 (album) landed on it, and similarly for June 1976. For all anyone knows, they may have landed at the album by clicking an internal or external link, be it from a search or another page. 85.67.32.244 (talk) 14:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 05:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They do. For every 4 people reading about the album, fewer than one is reading about the month. It is reasonable to assume, then, that people landing on the dab page probably (not provably) want those two articles in a very roughly similar proportion. What we can say with certainty, though, is that the evidence does not point to a majority of readers wanting to read about a month. Station1 (talk) 16:30, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't think we can infer with any certainty what readers who land at the DAB are looking for; perhaps they're looking for June 1976 in meteorology. We can't actually even say that a majority of readers want to read about the album: we might have one avid Grateful Dead fan who loads the page on average 23+3⁄4 times a day (perhaps they have a 15-minute tea break). I'm not saying either of those are likely, of course. But when the DAB page is averaging one hit every 1.4 days, some of which will be bot activity, I think it is difficult to draw any conclusions about what readers expect to find or do at the DAB page. 85.67.32.244 (talk) 22:25, 5 October 2021 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 05:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom and per points above. In terms of long-term significance, the name of the month will always end up being primary. BD2412 T 21:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Clear primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Clear WP:PTOPIC#2, long-term significance. For an analogous case, the PTOPIC for apple is the fruit, even though Apple, Inc. gets four times the pageviews. Narky Blert (talk) 13:11, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.