Talk:Julian Richer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Julian Richer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:27, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links -too many?[edit]

You have removed external links for the charities that Julian has set up and maintains, which are referenced and cited in the article. I am confused as to why and would want these reinstated, as they have been included on this entry for years and were just added to. 88.151.154.237 (talk) 12:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There were eight external links. Clearly too many. Readers can always use a search engine to find these websites. Please read WP:LINKFARM and Wikipedia:External links. Edwardx (talk) 13:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have read the article you linked. There is no specification of how many links are 'clearly too many' only that they should not overwhelm the contents of the article. Please can you direct me to a resource that states that 8 links is too many, as all the links are discussed in the article? It seems very arbitrary, when Terrence Conran's article has 10 external links, for example. 77.103.46.52 (talk) 13:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am only seeing nine at Terence Conran. Also too many, but he is a more notable person than Richer, and was active in several fields. Edwardx (talk) 20:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]