Talk:Judicial Executive Legislative Advisory and Consultative Council

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rule of Law, First in Philippine History[edit]

I created this MOA created body on May 13, 2008, a First in Philippine History Council. I ask editors to expand this in due course. --Florentino floro (talk) 11:02, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C.J. Panganiban's tracing of historical origin[edit]

I added this very rich historical thesis of C.J. Panganiban, for a historical picture of Jelac, its predecessors: History: The 21st Chief Justice Artemio Panganiban traced Jelacc’s roots from the 1993 proposed similar tripartite council, a body tasked to undertake judicial reforms. Chief Justice Andres Narvasa turned down membership due to legal questions and instead, a deputy court administrator attended the meetings merely as observer, not as member. Narvasa thereafter created the “Blueprint of Action for the Judiciary,” an 18-month consultation or judiciary-wide dialogue, funded by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). Later, Chief Justice Hilario G. Davide Jr. formed the much broader Action Program for Judicial Reforms (APJR), supported by the Philippine government, the UNDP, World Bank and Asian Development Bank, with further assistance from Australia, United Kingdom, Canada, European Union, Japan, the Netherlands and the United States. In Panganiban’s tenure, APJR centered on 4 ACID problems of the judiciary: “(1) Access to justice by the poor; (2) Corruption; (3) Incompetence of some judges; and (4) Delay in the resolution of cases with the 4 Ins: Independence, Integrity, Industry and Intelligence, and with ultimate goals of safeguarding of liberty and the nurturance of prosperity under the rule of law.” Narvasa, Davide and Panganiban’s judicial reforms achieved "the a) the doubling of judicial compensation through Republic Act 9227, b) computerization of the Sandiganbayan and selected trial courts, c) construction of model court houses in Angeles and Lapu Lapu cities, and the d) creation of the unique electronic library, the mobile courts, funded by Japan, and the Tagaytay Philippine Judicial Academy Center in Tagaytay", inter alia. On fiscal independence, the Supreme Court of the Philippines looks to Jelac "as the alternative for the annual budgetary grilling but it limited Jelac’s 'mandate' to its present functions." Panganiban finally criticized Jelac for being “obscured by penumbras of unconstitutionality and impropriety.”Inquirer.net, Agony over Jelac --Florentino floro (talk) 06:36, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move page to exclude acronym from article title[edit]

I suggest that the page be moved to an article title that excludes the acronym per Wikipedia convention. I'd do it, but due respect is extended to the author. — KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ Speak! 12:16, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P 3-B[edit]

Without passing Congress, this historical first gave breath to the judiciary who has no money. Now as 3rd co-equal branch will have a measly 1% of the budget in 2009. On the 2008 Philippine Declaration of Independence Day, JELACC member and Senate Majority Leader Francis Kiko Pangilinan announced at its second meeting that the judiciary would get an additional P 3-billion budget (from P 10 billion this year to P13 billion for 2009): "This is unprecedented and will bring the judiciary's budget to 1% of the national budget for the first time." The huge amount will be used for priority projects like the Manila Halls of Justice, courts computerization and to fill up vacancies in the judiciary (20% of 2500 courts nationwide).JELACC gives judiciary additional P3B for 2009 budget--Florentino floro (talk) 10:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Judicial Executive Legislative Advisory and Consultative Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Judicial Executive Legislative Advisory and Consultative Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]