Talk:Joy Mangano/Archives/2016

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joy Mangano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.oprah.com/gift/Joy-Mangano-Huggable-Hangers

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:00, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Requests for cleanup, claiming "promotional" and "advert"

I find that these claims:

for the article:

{{cleanup|reason=promotional, non-encyclopedic tone, inappropriate lead|date=December 2015}}

which appears as:

This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: promotional, non-encyclopedic tone, inappropriate lead. Please help improve this article if you can.

and for the section "Other products":

{{Advert section|date=October 2015}}

which appears as:

This section contains content that is written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic content written from a neutral point of view. (October 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

have no merit. However, before removing them, I'd like to discuss them and listen to anybody's reasons, so that we can improve the article together.

yoyo (talk) 01:37, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

I've replaced the "environmentally friendly" claim for GreenPan cookware with a direct, attributed quote from the press release about how its lack of PTFE and PFOA "makes it 'green' in manufacturing". I think this is an improvement - it's more specific and less emotionally laden; with even the press release placing "green" in quotes, thus weakening the claim. However, I do appreciate that a press release is not the best or most disinterested source, and would welcome any improvements. yoyo (talk) 02:14, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

I just changed the format of stuff and her personal life. I did not change any of the articles clean-up sections. I have no objections to the article now the way it is except there needs citations for a few claims. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 05:17, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

I agree that the article now passes scrutiny, and given that there have been no further objections here for months, I've removed both templates. Barte (talk) 20:21, 19 June 2016 (UTC)