This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Article subject satisfies WP:AUTHOR as he has a best selling book. Article seems pretty neutral, although needs expansion. I'm not seeing the problem. The Garbage Skow (talk) 19:51, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think Silver Seren's use of the connected contributor tag is pretty on the money, so I decided to do a quick fact checking on the sources and have made the needed changes. Since this article had possible POV issues, I removed content where I would normally just tag it with a citation needed. In the lead section I changed the wording to reflect the sources in some areas, like the section that listed Gordon's clients. Looking at the sources, I wouldn't classify them as clients. They are organizatins that have used his book. I also removed several of the clients listed as they were not substantiated by reliable sources. Also in the lead section, I found that the Washington Post and U.S. News and World Report were the only sources that actually covered his work. The Wall Street Journal was a passing mention by someone who had read one of his books and the New York Post involved Gordon being quoted about a topic other than himself. The Forbes coverage was actually a commentary article on the Frobes website that was written by Gordon himself, so I don't think that constitutes independent coverage.
The rest of the article, finally, looks pretty good, except that I'm not sure this should be rated as a top importance article? I'll leave that discussion to someone who might know better. LawrenceDuncan (talk) 16:29, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well done on these edits. I also agree on your questioning the importance rating--"Top" level articles are things like Capitalism, Income tax, and Inflation; Warren Buffett only clocks in at "Mid", for crying out loud--so I'm updating this one's to "Low". --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 00:24, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
