Talk:Johnny & Clyde

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Please add some more reviews.

๐™ณ๐š›๐šŽ๐šŠ๐š–๐š๐š’๐š–๐š–๐šŽ๐š› ๐š๐š’๐šœ๐šŒ๐šž๐šœ๐šœ 15:48, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by DirtyHarry991ย talkย 08:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Reidgregย (talk). Self-nominated at 19:45, 5 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Johnny & Clyde; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Article new and long enough. Hook cited inline and verified in source. Earwig says clear, only marking a single short quotation. Generally well-referenced, and interesting hook. QPQ done so good to go. Juxlos (talk) 06:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]