Talk:John Ranard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Correspondence[edit]

We're told:

Three of Ranard's photographs appeared in the exhibition according to correspondence with University of Louisville curator Elizabeth Reilly, although Ranard's name is not mentioned on the website advertising the exhibition.

Where is this correspondence published? If it's not published, it can't be cited ("Unpublished materials are not considered reliable"). -- Hoary (talk) 13:05, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Master's thesis[edit]

A lot of this is sourced to a master's thesis. But "Masters dissertations and theses are considered reliable only if they can be shown to have had significant scholarly influence". What evidence do we have of significant scholarly influence? -- Hoary (talk) 13:05, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two notes[edit]

One note:

The organisation itself is not cited because although the Andrei Sakharov Museum is a prestigious institution, it is devoted to issues of "peace, progress and human rights" and does not advertise art works in its possession.

And another:

The organisation is not cited. The Open Society Foundation, formerly Open Society Institute, is not in the business of collecting art work although their acquisition of items of art is notable. They do not advertise such acquisitions.

These seem to boil down to: "We're not providing references that you might expect to see, because we can't find them." Well, okay, but I don't remember having seen such comments in any other article. Are they particularly helpful here? (If so, I think they could be simplified; e.g. cut "is a prestigious institution, it is devoted to issues of 'peace, progress and human rights' and".) -- Hoary (talk) 00:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Ranard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]