Talk:John Leonard Orr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view[edit]

Impartial tone

Wikipedia describes disputes. Wikipedia does not engage in disputes. A neutral characterization of disputes requires presenting viewpoints with a consistently impartial tone; otherwise articles end up as partisan commentaries even while presenting all relevant points of view. Even where a topic is presented in terms of facts rather than opinions, inappropriate tone can be introduced through the way in which facts are selected, presented, or organized. Neutral articles are written with a tone that provides an unbiased, accurate, and proportionate representation of all positions included in the article.

The tone of Wikipedia articles should be impartial, neither endorsing nor rejecting a particular point of view. Try not to quote directly from participants engaged in a heated dispute; instead, summarize and present the arguments in an impartial tone.

Contentious labels

Value-laden labels—such as calling an organization a cult, an individual a racist, terrorist, or freedom fighter, or a sexual practice a perversion—may express contentious opinion and are best avoided unless widely used by reliable sources to describe the subject, in which case use in-text attribution.

The prefix pseudo- indicates that something is false or spurious, which may be debatable. The suffix -gate suggests the existence of a scandal. Use these in articles only when they are in wide use externally, with in-text attribution if in doubt. When using controversial, give readers enough information to know what the controversy is about. Make sure, as well, that reliable sources establish the existence of a controversy and that the term is not used to grant a fringe viewpoint undue weight.


You don't see that Osama bin Laden is defined in the opening statement as a terrorist although throughout the World "He's most known as a" terrorist.93.138.9.151 (talk) 16:20, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:John Leonard Orr/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Rated start-Class today. Requires infobox, image if possible, re-write suspect section on "in popular culture" which may be perceived as a trivia section in its present form. Ref (chew)(do) 18:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC) Uprated to B-Class after re-write, addition of infobox, and good quality image (not of the subject himself). A slim B. Ref (chew)(do) 18:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 20:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Leonard Orr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:07, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Leonard Orr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

His motivation???[edit]

Did they ever figure out his motivation? I guess he never volunteered one since he maintains his innocence. What did the psychiatrists say? Thanks in advance to anybody who has information on this.Betathetapi545 (talk) 17:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

His daughter has said that he received some kind of sexual gratification from setting the fires. Bratsj (talk) 18:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
He investigated his own crimes and found points of origin. No one else could because he started the fires. 192.198.57.217 (talk) 04:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update on Pseudonym: For what it's worth, The American Prison Writing Archive at Hamilton College has entries written by John L. Orr published under the pseudonym of Bryce Canyon with prisoner number P-13502. --Legomancer (talk) 05:13, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orr is in the the California Department of Corrections inmate database.[edit]

There is a John Leonard Orr in the California Incarcerated Records and Information Search (CIRIS) database, which contradicts with the last line of the Trial and Conviction portion of this article. Here is the link to his page in the database: https://apps.cdcr.ca.gov/ciris/details?cdcrNumber=P13502 2601:646:4300:780:1CAE:4589:D087:C3AF (talk) 06:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]