Talk:Jive Software

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 January 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Removing external links from the main article[edit]

I think the external links (direct links to the company's product pages) shold be removed from the main article. Also the text should be edited to look more like an encyclopedia article and less like an advertisement. Lebha (talk) 10:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Lebha, for adding your concise, accurate, and valid comments. I agree wholeheartedly. As I began reading this article (because my employer is purchasing their product) so I could learn a little about what we are getting into, I was struck by the "glossy" & "Flyer" feel of the information. I don't see much objectivity, so will look elsewhere to find what I am looking for. User:kpearson99 (talk) Thu Sep 19 19:08:00 UTC 2013 —Preceding undated comment added 19:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rule about exhaustive corporate histories[edit]

I see procedural acquisition spam on a lot of startup articles, but usually not ones with any notability.

Is there any reason to exhaustively list acquisitions, changes-of-CEO, and funding rounds? They don't tell us what the company is or what it does unless it's a holdings corporation (which this isn't) Jergling (talk) 23:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]