This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
I can understand sources using different styles. I always tend to be guided by what appeared on the record labels/ covers. Is there a case for choosing one and sticking to it? It just looks a bit untidy to chronic obsessives like me. Martinevans123 (talk) 08:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC) Amnodr = "a subterranean world??[reply]
My view when I wrote it, I think, was to reflect the inconsistencies in the sources by being equally inconsistent in the text, and not making an issue of the inconsistency, which seemed to me to be (sorry) somewhat trivial. But I'll go with the flow. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:54, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my goodness, what a video gem. But no strong view - I can see your twisted logic, haha. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:32, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
