This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
this article is obviously pro-Pederson, but it doesn't really matter, he's going to lose. his campaign is faltering badly and kyl seems to be doing a decent job so far. pederson's getting slaughtered in all the polls, even worse now than before he declared his candidacy.
Care to elaborate which parts are obviously pro-Pederson? Or to even register and sign your talk page additions? --JMurphy 01:34, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
i guess it's not too bad at second glance. he's given alot of credit for fundraising, rebuilding the party and getting napolitano and goddard elected, without mentioning that much of janet/dems money came from him personally. at least $2M i think. from what i hear, the az democratic party is not exactly a well oiled machine (neither is the repubs) and really isn't that much better off because of him. also, a slight dig at the end about kyl's polling numbers, "traditionally low for an incumbant." that really isn't specifically relevant to pederson himself, it's just kinda random and unexplained how it's stated. which numbers? favorability? name recognition? approval? head to head? is that why pederson decided to run? that's how i read it at first glance, but most polls are dubious if unexplained and we dont' even know what polls they are referring to. actually, all the head to head polls i've seen in the papers recently put kyl way ahead of pederson. also, that would be like putting a sentence in jon kyl's wikipedia article referring to news articles that say pederson's campaign is failing to gain traction and stating that as a fact, when others might actually disagree with that assesment. but i'll leave it be because i haven't done enough research to formally contribute. maybe when i get some time i will.
