This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:29, May 10, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
If this does not meet the notability guidlines, then we can delete the Disney article as well.
This notability nonsense should be removed from the article, it is like requiring notability to be established for the Disney article, for example. This company may not be as old or as big as Disney, but their productions are of as high a quality and as loved as those of Disney, if not more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.124.144.66 (talk) 17:31, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Though I disagree with the above statement and it goes without saying that Jetlag's animated films are neither as well known or appreciated nor of as high quality as Disney's, the subject is notable enough even if considerably more obscure. Few would consider Wikipedia as the primary source for articles relating to the Walt Disney Company, while the scare availability of information related to Jetlag Productions would make the Wikipedia article more valuable than one for Disney, which has plenty of more reliable sources than Wikipedia. T.W. (talk) 18:26, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]