Talk:Jean-Louis Bruguière

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Paul Kagame[edit]

Obviously, the subject most associated with Bruguière these days is Paul Kagame. While I think this page should mentioned Bruguière's ridiculous indictment of Kagame, it should also be reported that Bruguière has the weakest of all evidence that would never be allowed in a reasonable court: two hear-say witnesses. This has made Bruguière something of laughing-stock among human-rights watchers. Bruguière himself indicted Kagame immediately following the downing of Habyaramani's plane, completely discrediting himself as a judge, before going on a hunt for witnesses. Mvblair 19:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


weakest evidences? Kagame own inteligent officier? himself? in exile and garded as salman Rushdie?

This Juge arrested most of islamist terrorists around the world, and gave CIA more informations on them than any others!

get a rest, Kagame killed after 1994 and helped to massacre 1 millions ppl in Congo! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.67.162.240 (talk) 03:50, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Thurman and UTA[edit]

There is no evidence that Thurman produced the proof that convicted the 6 Libyans convicted of the UTA bombing. The evidence can be found in the civil case of Pugh v. Libya in which the relatives of 7 US citizens brought a case against that country. There is no reference to Thurman whatsoever. The details can be found at www.crowell.com Incidentally US security elements used the UTA case as a basis to convict Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi of the Lockerbie bombing. Chasnor15 (talk) 20:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The evidence that Thurman produced the proof which convicted the 6 Libyans of the UTA bombing is here.---PJHaseldine (talk) 21:49, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish?[edit]

"By birth a Jewish"

a. Isn't proper english b. Is not supported by any source, english or french

Therefore, I'm deleting it. If you can find any reliable source, please put it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.148.64 (talk) 15:42, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some sources for a potential new section[edit]

Hello, I found some sources about this judge. One is a report of International Federal Court for Human Rights and an other is story about a complain against the judge made in a French Tribunal. Both are in French.

1) http://www.fidh.org/rapports/r271.htm

2) http://www.lemague.net/dyn/spip.php?article6786

That can be use for a controversy section about this guy. What do you think about that ? ( please, answer on my talk page )Samuel B52 (talk) 15:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]