This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Rutnam's name showed up on my Glendora watchlist. A few problems with the article. 1. The SGVN is a small, weekly paper; so small that its' website does not list anyone on its staff. 2. The citations provided did not involve the paper. 3. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED, which means Rutnam does not get a Wikipedia article based on who his relatives are. I've tagged the article with a Notability template. Perhaps the tag will attract editors who can help improve the article. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 16:20, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
S. Rich, As you mentioned there is no name mentioned of its staff in the SGVN website, but a Google Search identifies Jayam Rutnam's with the newspaper and his title as staff reporter. I don't have any idea how I could quote other than the present way, I have sourced on the Page. Please alter if you know any better way.Chandana Jayasinghe(Sri Lanka) (talk) 09:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad to see you are working on the article. Keep up the good work. However .... the Google search results are a no-go. See external links no #6: search results. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 16:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
