Talk:James Russell Lowell/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Review 1[edit]

~~A good~~ This article article is—

Well written: very
Factually accurate and verifiable: All sourced, and nothing that seemed dubiousto me.
Broad in its coverage:Covers all areas of his life, with more detail on the things that made him famous.
Neutral: Says what he did, and people opinions of him. No bias.
Stable: Check
Illustrated, if possible, by images: Check

Hence i have very little to suggest for improvment, it certainly passses as a GA. FA? It's the only review process here that is nit-picky enough to make improvments, imo.

Well done :-)Yobmod (talk) 11:05, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, two GA passes for me in just a couple days! Thanks so much for taking the time to review this. JRL is next on my FAC list, I think. I had a blast researching him. Thanks again! --Midnightdreary (talk) 11:40, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]