Talk:Jake Lynch

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Jake Lynch is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Comments on article[edit]

Dear fellow wikipedians:

Thanks for those editors who have already made contributions to this article. Just some comments:

1. I agree there are areas where the article can be expanded - the original is very much a bare bones exercise, so if there are folk with more expert knowledge who can expand the article, that would be great.

2. I think that a good additional section could be entitled "Key publications", or "Select publications". Again, this is an area where expert knowledge would be useful.

3. I included the BDS court case section with some trepidation, although one can hardly ignore this. I've tried just to stick to the facts, and hopefully there will not be a wiki-war on this.

Hope the above is helpful. Research17 (talk) 09:37, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for those fellow-editors who've added templates in recent days, with the very useful suggestions for expansion of two paragraphs and more independent references. The two paragraphs have been now expanded and more independent references have been now added. What I plan to do is therefore to remove the templates, but I will wait a week before doing so, in case some editors believe that this action might be premature. If you think that the two paragraphs might still be expanded more or that further independent references are called for, please feel free to let me know on this Talk Page. Research17 (talk) 03:21, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As flagged above, I've now removed the templates. My thanks to those who inserted the templates - it was a useful in prompting me to add more independent references and to expand the relevant sections, which I've now done. Kind regards, Research17 (talk) 17:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]