Talk:JSON-RPC

JavaScript Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject JavaScript, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to JavaScript, and to the development of user scripts for use on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaScriptWikipedia:WikiProject JavaScriptTemplate:WikiProject JavaScriptJavaScript articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Computing: Networking / Software / Websites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Websites (assessed as Low-importance).

Example[edit]

As someone has pointed out, the example for JSON-RPC is outdated. I don't know exactly what has changed with JSON-RPC, but I think it would be more reader-friendly if someone with a bit more experience with JSON-RPC would correct it. Quartz (talk) 23:26, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updated examples[edit]

I have added examples for the current release (1.0) and for the proposed specification (2.0).
If anyone has the time for it, the bullet list under "Implementations" could be made into a nice table and extended with more implementations (there is a richer list on the official JSON-RPC homepage). --Clausc (talk) 15:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WDSL equivalent: SMD?[edit]

What is the WSDL equivalent for JSON-RPC?

There is something called SMD, which means - depending on which source you consult - "Simple Method Description" (http://groups.google.com/group/json-rpc/web/simple-method-description-for-json-rpc-example) or "Service Mapping Description" (http://groups.google.com/group/json-schema/web/service-mapping-description-proposal) but the sources disagree on the syntax. --AndreKR (talk) 23:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

take a look at JSON-WSP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakobsg (talk • contribs) 09:45, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Versions[edit]

Someone could write a few more descriptive sentences to each version. Currently it's too short to be useful. thanks. --188.99.245.106 (talk) 14:40, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Implementations[edit]

Perhaps it'd be clearer if the implementation were ordered by the programming language. --178.2.90.28 (talk) 13:54, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned up the implementations list a little (e.g. removed doubles, corrected links) and removed a few unmaintained/outdated projects. --greip (talk) 09:59, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Additional parameters[edit]

Many of implementations are not complete (like when there is only a server or only a client, no batch calls, etc) or implementations are restrictive (transport-dependent). So I suppose it's the reason to add columns to the table such as "completeness of implementation" and "transport-dependency".
And maybe it will be better to move that table to another page, like "comparison of JSON-RPC implementations". 91.77.140.144 (talk) 06:18, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Extensions[edit]

(http://qooxdoo.org/documentation/general/rpc/jsonrpc_extensions) Qooxdoo defines a service to list JSON-RPC extensions.

(http://qooxdoo.org/documentation/general/rpc/jsonrpc_introspection) The Introspection extension can describe methods. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.226.39 (talk) 14:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Using TCP/IP sockets[edit]

Not sure why the *Usage* section mentions that support of TCP/IP sockets started at version 2.0. The JSON-RPG spec 1.0 section 2.1 already mentions "the use of TCP/IP socket streams". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.50.169.234 (talk) 16:02, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance and rating of JavaScript articles[edit]

Concerning editing and maintaining JavaScript-related articles...

Collaboration...[edit]

If you are interested in collaborating on JavaScript articles or would like to see where you could help, stop by Wikipedia:WikiProject JavaScript and feel free to add your name to the participants list. Both editors and programmers are welcome.

Where to list JavaScript articles[edit]

We've found over 300 JavaScript-related articles so far. If you come across any others, please add them to that list.

User scripts[edit]

The WikiProject is also taking on the organization of the Wikipedia community's user script support pages. If you are interested in helping to organize information on the user scripts (or are curious about what we are up to), let us know!

If you have need for a user script that does not yet exist, or you have a cool idea for a user script or gadget, you can post it at Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests. And if you are a JavaScript programmer, that's a great place to find tasks if you are bored.

How to report JavaScript articles in need of attention[edit]

If you come across a JavaScript article desperately in need of editor attention, and it's beyond your ability to handle, you can add it to our list of JavaScript-related articles that need attention.

Rating JavaScript articles[edit]

At the top of the talk page of most every JavaScript-related article is a WikiProject JavaScript template where you can record the quality class and importance of the article. Doing so will help the community track the stage of completion and watch the highest priority articles more closely.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 01:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Batch requests optional feature?[edit]

Are batch requests a required or an optional feature for JSON-RPC servers? --RokerHRO (talk) 21:55, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]