Talk:J. Clifford Baxter

What does, "[the note] was hand printed, not written," mean?

Hand printing just happens to be a form of writing. The "not written" comment doesn't make any sense. It was most definitely written if it was hand printed. I'm removing that part. MagnoliaSouth ^(talk) 10:28, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

I am guessing that the original author meant it was not written in the cursive style. In case you still care :) 116.231.75.71 (talk) 07:12, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Witness

After the collapse of Enron, he was sought by authorities to testify against fellow Enron executives. Is it standard to have an automatic investigation in the case of a death of a government witness? If so, has the investigation been published?

BMIKESCI

I found this article. I don't know how good it is as source, however. It might point the way to other research.

http://www.hereinreality.com/autopsy.html

BMIKESCI

Was there ever an explanation of where he got the "Glaser Safety Slug?" This is a very unusual bullet. I don't think it is the kind of bullet that most gun owners have. It certainly seems like an unlikely choice for a suicide. Did he have an air marshall in the family? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.109.195.126 (talk) 02:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

redirect

Does anyone know how to get Clifford Baxter to redirect to this article? - BMIKESCI 02:43, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Looks like it is already redirecting to me --Fxer 19:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

See also links

In my opinion, the see also links do not belong on the article. I tried to remove them, but my edit was reverted. Allow me to explain why I removed these links:

1. Wikipedia:Guide_to_layout#See_also states in bold that internal links should not repeat links that are already in the article. Both links are in the article already.
2. These links aren't related to the person, they're simply related to his alleged method of suicide. This is like placing a link to revolver on the see also section of Abraham Lincoln.

I admit that I'm not very knowledgeable about the subject of this article, so if there's something I'm missing, please tell me so other people won't make the same mistake. On the other hand, let me know if you agree with me and I can remove the section again, mentioning this discussion in the edit summary. Thanks in advance. --Aristeo 21:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Good points, and I see your point. With the links in the text, there really is no reason to include the "See also" links. Have deleted the additional "See also" links. Thanks. Yaf 21:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I appreciate your speedy reply. :) Take care. --Aristeo 22:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete this at your discretion

This will probably get speedily deleted, and I hope it will, but I will state -- for the record -- good riddance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.181.197.172 (talk) 20:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Hmm. Odd that it is still here nearly a year later, eh? MagnoliaSouth ^(talk) 10:28, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on J. Clifford Baxter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070807073142/http://www.click2houston.com:80/news/1490508/detail.html to http://www.click2houston.com/news/1490508/detail.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)