Talk:It's All Over Now, Baby Blue/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 15:37, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    This artcile is well written and compies sufficiently with the MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    The article is well referenced, all on-line sources check out, all appear to be reliable sources, I assume good faith for off-line sources.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Broad and focussed
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Fair
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Congratulations on a well written, researched article. I couldn't really find any faults. Arguably the prose could do with the odd tweak here and there, but nothing at all serious. Passing as a GA. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: