Talk:Iraq oil law (2007)

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Iraq High‑importance

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ridiculous citations[edit]

This article makes the absurd claim that the Iraq oil law is a power grab for the United States and sources Ramzy Salman, a Baathist who worked for Saddam, in an Al Jazeera opinion piece. Aside from being biased, it is intentionally misleading. The law opens up investment in Iraq to any nation, not the United States exclusively. Changes made. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.230.206.164 (talk) 21:50:04, August 19, 2007 (UTC)

Neutrality / broken refs[edit]

This article has had a horrible lack of neutrality. Unsourced statements, bias, exaggeration. Two of the sources used were written by the same person, both as opinion pieces. The remaining Juhasz citation isn't even accessible. I fixed some of it and tagged other bits. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by TBSchemer (talk • contribs)

All the ref links work for me. You might need to register with the NYT to access the link.

I'll attempt to find other sources, but lacking that, I'll try to tone down the rhetoric in regards to the U.S.'s role. Well, see. -- Kendrick7^talk 01:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was fine. I was looking for a quick summary of the law and this provided it. The citations I needed to check worked. I think wikipediaers are too critical sometimes. These articles are supposed to be works in progress. Thank you for your work. --Vitalmove 07:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What a joke![edit]

as soon as the colonialists leave all their dreamt up "laws" will be torn up. Some sadrist dictator will take over and iraq start rebuilding itself again just set back 50 years58.106.19.162 02:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

12.5% Guaranteed Profit[edit]

An article explaining how a Profit Sharing Agreement works (which is quite complicated) is here: http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2005/crudedesigns.htm#A1

It notes that the "royalty" goes to the state (Iraq) rather than the company. The draft of the law is found here: http://web.krg.org/uploads/documents/Draft%20Iraq%20Oil%20and%20Gas%20Law%20English__2007_03_09_h17m2s47.pdf

Note that on page 29, Article 34, it describes the "royalty" as 12.5%, paid BY the INOC or other holders of an Exploration or Production right. Article 33 also clarifies this.

Further, the article cited after this section states "The 12.5 per cent profit protected by the new law is also disputed by many as being too low." They are talking about the royalty, which would be paid to Iraq, being too low, not anything paid to the oil companies. 68.109.132.149 22:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not going to happen anymore?[edit]

Given the recent auctions as of a couple of weeks ago I don't think this law will ever come to pass. Article should be updated to reflect this.--12.47.15.38 (talk) 16:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Iraq oil law (2007). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070717185159/http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article2152438.ece to http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article2152438.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]