Talk:Instant Karma (House)

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage / House

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
	This redirect is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This redirect is supported by the House task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This redirect has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Thirteen's Destination[edit]

I just watched the episode and there's no mention of Bangkok or any evidence on screen that's her destination. She's boarding a "Malaysia Pacific" plane, that's all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.233.162.219 (talk) 06:59, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar[edit]

It will be originally aired on - Is this correct grammar? -86.16.45.62 (talk) 19:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Careless wording[edit]

"He ended up having some illness the billionaire decided to throw away his money and it was good episode." Clearly this needs to go.

Cholesterol Correction[edit]

House's exact words added during his discussion with Chase. The previous description is problematic for several reasons. Previously it said "House explains that Dibala was a large man, it's only given that he would have cholesterol problems." This discounts the added risk factors of age and race that the writer included. Also there is no implication in the actual quote that there was a problem with his cholesterol, merely that he was on medication to alter it's level in some way. It may seem implicit but the presence of a treatment is not proof of a problem, only proof of a treatment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.255.232.89 (talk) 20:31, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]