Talk:Insight Technology

Fair use rationale for Image:Insighttech.gif

Image:Insighttech.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Lack of proof in Subheading.

Under the "Manufacturing Process" subheader, there's a paragraph about the LA-16u laser target designator and gloves. After a rather extensive internet search, I've found no evidence that this paragraph can be backed up with a source. The original text is here:

"Quality control

Insight Technology has been known to push products out into the field with known issues. The most dangerous known issue is related to LA-16u/PEQ Handheld Laser Marker. During manufacturing and issue arose where the device would shutdown when the operator was wearing gloves. In a rush to meet deadlines, the production workers were informed to assemble the unit without gloves.The information was not relayed to the receiving company and could result in soldiers lives being risked."

As I've found nothing to back up this claim - not even hearsay evidence on an internet forum - I've deleted this section, as I feel it unfairly casts L3/Insight in a negative light.