Talk:Inger Lorre

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography assessment rating comment[edit]

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 08:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weird paragraph[edit]

There was a paragraph in the bio that used two sources, reliable, to paint a picture that was very much POV. It painted Lorre as a drug addict responsible for bringing down the band in three sentences. This does not provide undue weight for other circumstances involving the band's issues. Feel free to discuss and reinsert when we can make it balanced. Keegan (talk) 07:52, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To confirm, did you mean to write "does not provide undue weight"? It seems to contradict your next sentence where you note the information is not balanced. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 15:54, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, you removed two factual paragraphs because they didn't provide "balance"? If you know of cite-able facts that can provide that balance, by all means put them in the article. However, those paragraphs shouldn't have been removed. I saw nothing in them that was incorrect or slanted. Hondo77 (talk) 23:52, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong PoV[edit]

This article is full of a biased PoV with some parts almost reading like a press release. Someone with more time should fix it up a bit. danzig138 (talk) 07:14, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inger Lorre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930205147/http://www.laweekly.com/music/music/inger-lorre-patron-saint-of-fucked-over-musicians/6743/ to http://www.laweekly.com/music/music/inger-lorre-patron-saint-of-fucked-over-musicians/6743/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]