Talk:Immacolata (character)

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Spelling[edit]

This page needs to be taken down and then put back up with the CORRECT spelling of the character The Immacolotta's name. I have the book, and am starring at it right now as I type, and it has two "T's". User:198.146.205.72 15:39, 17 June 2009

See spelling at [1] and [2]. Gimmetrow 16:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's not Clive Barker's OFFICIAL site because there isn't one anymore. That is a fansite and it apt to have typographical errors.The second link you use as a reference has no actual printing of The Immacolotta's name in any of the articles used.Go to the library and check the book out for yourself. "Weaveworld". [User:198.146.205.72]] 19:17, 17 June 2009

If this is the case, we could simply move the article rather than taking it down. I suggest you check this for example, it is spelled "Immacolata" three times and Clive Barker hasn't noted any correction, it's the official site. Dictabeard (talk) 07:31, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Domville?[edit]

Is he possibly "the rake"? I definitely remember some 'rake' guy from this story. Dictabeard (talk) 07:26, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved as proposed. (non-admin closure) Red Slash 23:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Immacolata → Immacolata (character) – Since immaculata and immaculate redirect to immaculate conception, so should immacolata. There are famous paintings called "Immacolata", in reference to the immaculate conception, so immaculate conception is the PRIMARYTOPIC for immacolata. --Relisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC) JFH (talk) 01:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support - and either redirect as JFH, or alternatively move Immacolata (disambiguation) over base space. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:15, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment what about the alternate name Incantatrix ? Wouldn't that be better than a diambiguated title? Anyways rename to something. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support this alternative proposal as less ... ambiguous. My support, of course, is with the proviso that the subject really is notable, a question on which I have no opinion. Esoglou (talk) 07:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment FYI, there's also a move request at Talk:Immaculate (disambiguation) -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 06:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Move as proposed (Incantatrix "Clive Barker" turns up too few sources for this to be a useful title). I'd prefer moving the dab page Immacolata (disambiguation) to the base name rather than redirecting to Immaculate Conception for now.--Cúchullain ^t/c 14:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.