Talk:Image frequency

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Image frequency redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This redirect is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

If

Images are produced in every receiver. They are recognizable as a duplicate of the legitimate signal,
typically offset by 21.4, 21.6, or 21.7 MHz (twice the intermediate frequency--I.F.) from the actual
frequency, depending upon the scanner.

which I found on the net, is talking about the same thing, then it sure isn't too clear. Jidanni 20:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

<nowiki>Insert non-formatted text hereInsert non-formatted text here</nowiki>

Article explanation[edit]

I think that the explanation in the article is incorrect. Do I have to present a proof?

TomyDuby (talk) 11:25, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also see that it is wrong. Will you fix it TomyDuby? Cuddlyable3 (talk) 20:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that I can.

TomyDuby (talk) 04:47, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed some more. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 20:29, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]