Talk:Ikedaya incident

Japan: History Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 08:43, May 10, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the History task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

A few notes[edit]

1. The Shinsengumi did NOT have 10 units until 1865, a year after the Ikedaya Affair.

2. While there are a few theories in regard of Yoshida's death, he was definitely NOT killed by Okita. (Nevertheless, Yoshida was likely injured by Okita during the incident.)

3. Rurouni Kenshin's Kyoto Arc does NOT begin with a very brief battle at the Ikedaya. Kenshin does NOT have the complete cross-shape scar till Dec (lunar calendar), 1864 and the name of the inn IS listed in the anime. (Eventhough I could not read that, I could read "Ikedaya.") One could also get several clues from the conversation at the inn.

Nlf7 22:29, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Ikedaya Incident. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 07:55, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ikedaya Jiken → Ikedaya Incident – Per WP:USEENGLISH. "Ikedaya Incident" gets more Google Books, Scholar, Web Search hits compared to "Ikedaya Affair". --Kusunose 02:55, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Shouldn't it be decapitalised, as in Ikedaya incident? Jenks24 (talk) 05:00, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- When I searched Google Books, capitalized one was more common than decapitalised one. The fact Ikedaya Incident redirects here and actually used, while Ikedaya incident is still a red link and has no incoming links is another indication the capitalized form is more common. If some naming conventions suggest to use decapitalized form, I'm fine with it. --Kusunose 01:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I get 1 post-1980 English-language Google Book hit for "Ikedaya Jiken," 74 for "Ikedaya Incident". Kauffner (talk) 10:19, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.