Talk:Ichimura Tetsunosuke

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group.

Japan: Biography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 23:52, May 9, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Biography task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

A few notes[edit]

1. Ichimura was born in 1854.

2. Ichimura was summoned by Hijikata on April 15 (lunar calendar) or May 3 (lunar calendar) 1869, not March. Seven 22:04, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I realize that now. The note about March 5 was my mistake. I had meant to write May 5, which is the date my source holds. My apologies for putting the wrong month.

Since I've written dd/mm to be mm/dd in the past, I thought that was the case. Seven 22:41, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question. Are they both meant to be lunar calendar? It just seems weird that they're both included if which day of the lunar calendar isn't known as opposed to one being on the Western calendar. Cnscaevola (talk) 18:51, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]