This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Music of the United Kingdom, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Music of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Music of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Music of the United KingdomMusic of the United Kingdom articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved, WP:IAR for the slightly early closure - this should had been a technical request and was intended as such per the nominator's comment below. (closed by non-admin page mover) Kostas20142 (talk) 01:17, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Convention clearly supported by our MOS. Primergrey (talk) 04:06, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I think this could have been moved without discussion–per WP:RMUM–as it is considered uncontroversial electricsBahiagrasseverywhere 12:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was confused as to how technical moves worked since I thought you needed Twinkle to do it, but now I think I figured it out. I'll put requests such as this one at WP:RM#TR now on. ResPM come to my window 13:11, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support and speedy close – uncontroversial technical move. Paintspot Infez (talk) 14:52, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination, Primergrey, Bahiagrass and Paintspot Infez. An uncontroversial technical request, indeed. —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs) 02:02, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.