Talk:ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 25 December 2009 by reviewer Fastily (talk · contribs).

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

COI Declaration[edit]

I am an editor affiliated with ISO/IEC JTC 1 and the American National Standards Institute who has made significant edits to this article. I have added the sections "History," "Scope and mission," and "Collaborations," and expanded the sections "Working groups," and "Published standards." I have also updated the section "Member countries" to the most current list of participating and observing countries. I am aware of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, particularly the COI guideline, and have done my best to follow them as strictly as possible. I would greatly appreciate any feedback or comments to help improve this article.

LauraALo (talk)

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:ISO/IEC JTC1/SC36 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:16, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

POSIX work group disbanded?[edit]

Is this a kind of joke or something that POSIX workgroup WG15 is disbanded? Isn't POSIX, like, still, how should I say, well-maintained? Dannyniu (talk) 11:16, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140107192608/http://home.comcast.net/~wmklein/DOX/History.pdf to http://home.comcast.net/~wmklein/DOX/History.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blinded by the blight[edit]

Couldn't we just put "(hereafter SC 22)" in the lead sentence and then substitute every occurrence of "ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22" with "SC 22" where the former string is not part of an official wiki link?

This page is probably losing 80% of its already slim (yet determined) audience on instantaneous eye bleed.

Visually, this page is like heading outdoors into a nail storm with no protective eyewear.

Many a certain hidebound, committee-hardened survivalist sect enjoys this kind of punishment, but shouldn't this page should be regarded as outreach effort, and not just as documentation by and for the choir? — MaxEnt 20:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How many members are there in the C standard committee iso/iec jtc1/sc22/wg14 ??[edit]

what resources are available about this ?? Lakecityquietpills (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]