Talk:Hurricane Eta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


WHY?[edit]

Why in the world does the preview have only 1 citation??? ~~ 🏅🌀𝕾𝖚𝖕𝖊𝖗 𝕮𝖞𝖈𝖑𝖔𝖓𝖎𝖈 𝕾𝖙𝖔𝖗𝖒 𝕮𝖔𝖗𝖔𝖓𝖆🌀🏅 18:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As per Wikipedia:WHENNOTCITE, "Citations are often omitted from the lead section of an article, insofar as the lead summarizes information for which sources are given later in the article, although quotations and controversial statements, particularly if about living persons, should be supported by citations even in the lead." Hope this answers your question. Drdpw (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Drdpw: OK, but other articles have at least 7 citations in the lead, so why only one here? ~~ 🏅🌀𝕾𝖚𝖕𝖊𝖗 𝕮𝖞𝖈𝖑𝖔𝖓𝖎𝖈 𝕾𝖙𝖔𝖗𝖒 𝕮𝖔𝖗𝖔𝖓𝖆🌀🏅 19:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Split the meteorological history?[edit]

Created by sockpuppet.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Eta was pretty complex in terms of track so i think it deserves an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wowiskwpoopi (talkcontribs) 20:52, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There’s no need at this point, given the size of the article, but if this article gets extended much more, a split would be warranted. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 22:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose until this article grows sufficiently. NoahTalk 20:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose who's ready to add 15KB of content to this article? 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 10:53, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 June 2021[edit]

Please change |DUP-work=c |work=Despacho de comunicasiones y estrategua presidencal to |work=Despacho de comunicasiones y estrategua presidencal which was mangled by User:Drdpw. thank you. 98.230.196.188 (talk) 20:19, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out; I will fix it. Drdpw (talk) 20:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

I saw that the image was changed. I believe that the previous image shows the hurricane much better. The current image seems to definitely be a lower intensity than the latter. If someone could explain why it was replaced, let me know. Meteorologist200 (talk) 12:21, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting death data[edit]

In the impacts section, the deaths go to over 200 while in the infobox (with no citations) says there were only 170. Is there a reason for this? ✶Mitch199811✶ 18:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]