Talk:Hungry Horse, Montana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CDP[edit]

I presume that census-designated place is govspeak for unincorporated town, which, of course, it is. Glacierman 04:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, enough with the CDP jazz. I don't mind the use of it at the top of the page, but Hungry Horse is a town. Period. Enough with the bureaucratic jargon! I've changed CDP to 'town' wherever it appears in the body of the article. Glacierman 06:26, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Difference between the PO and the CDP[edit]

Census Bureau says the population of the CDP was 936 in 2000. They also say that the population for ZIP code 59919 (Hungry Horse) was 911. We seem to have two different Hungry Horses here. That's why I have a problem with the whole CDP concept. Glacierman 07:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem? The Census Bureau, in cooperation with local officials, defines CDPs to provide statistical data for populated places that are not incorporated municipalities. Many CDPs use the same name as a local name, which are sometimes colloquially also referred to a towns (although they are not incorporated and do not have a separate municipal government). However, despite using input from local officials, the Census Burea definition of the CDP may not always exactly correspond with the understanding local residents may have of the area with the same name as the CDP.
ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTA) are another matter altogether -- they may or may not correlate to any local understanding of a "town". They approximate the delivery area of a particular ZIP Code and may include large expanses of sparsely populated area along with more densely populated areas. For example, here is a map of the 59919 ZCTA and here is a map of the CDP. Pretty big difference. For some additional perspective, here is the South Fork County Census Division which includes both Hungry Horse and the 59919 ZCTA as well as some other areas. And here is the adjacent Bad Rock-Columbia Heights CCD.
Personally, I think the description used for the statistics should reflect what they actually are -- in this case the CDP. Local understanding of the "town" may vary and there is no incorporated municipality or other authority to define the boundaries otherwise. But if you are comfortable that the definition of the CDP pretty closely approximates that of the town, then there's really not much problem with changing most of the instances of CDP to town. Of course, if you want to talk about aspects of the town other than the Census statistics, then by all means use the term "town". olderwiser 14:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hungry Horse, Montana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]