Talk:Huawei E5

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Disclosure and title of article[edit]

This is a brief note to explain that I am the author of this article and I have a potential conflict of interest with Huawei as a topic. When writing the article I have been mindful of Wikipedia's guidelines and aimed to be as neutral as I am able. Also, before the article was created, I invited other editors to review it in my userspace and the article was made live by an editor responding to my requests for feedback. If there is any non-neutral POV in the article, I would invite other editors to discuss it here, or make the necessary edits.

Since I did not move the article live myself, there has been an error in the disambiguation of the article. I do not think that the title should be "E5 (phone)" as it is a Wi-Fi device, not a model of phone. I'd like to request that the title be amended to reflect this, either to "Huawei E5" or "E5 (device)". Thank you. --Bouteloua (talk) 22:49, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand - and accept, yes, 'phone' is incorrect. I'm not sure which is the best term; I'd be happy with either of those suggestions. I'd avoid "E5 (MiFi" simply because I don't think most people know what it is. If I had to choose, I'd go with "E5 (device)", I think. Chzz ► 01:03, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chzz, thank you for the reply here. I have been looking into the guidelines on naming articles and I think that since the main goal is to provide a precise name, it would be best to use "Huawei E5" in order to properly distinguish the E5 from other electronic devices (both now and in the future) named E5. Also, it seems common for articles on electronic devices and phones to be named using the company name and model name. For example, I see on the E5 disambiguation page that the article for Nokia's E5 phone is titled "Nokia E5". If this seems reasonable to you, please can you make the change? Thank you. --Bouteloua (talk) 14:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind, but I have now made this change. I am open to discussing it if there are any objections, but I hope you agree my reasoning is sound. Thank you. --Bouteloua (talk) 20:03, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Huawei E5. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]